Home / Companies / adidas AG / 7 May 2026
adidas AG: meeting of 7 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
169 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the adidas AG meeting of 7 May 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 76.1% of reported votes for; 69 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
865 vote records from 141 filers. 14 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
194 vote records from 53 filers. 1 of the 47 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
538 vote records from 141 filers. 1 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
538 vote records from 141 filers. 0 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
721 vote records from 141 filers. 7 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
690 vote records from 133 filers. 1 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
209 vote records from 12 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Voting instructions for motions or nominations by shareholders that are not made accessible before the agm...
52 vote records from 23 filers. 12 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Additional or Amended Shareholder Proposals
20 vote records from 16 filers. 15 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | No report | Against * |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For * | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report | For | No report | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | No report | Against * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | For | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | No report | Against * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Voya | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | No report | Against * |
| Nationwide | Against * | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | No report | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Principal | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Global X | For | No report | For | No report | Against * |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | No report | Against * |
| DWS | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Allspring | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| VanEck | For | No report | For | No report | Against * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against * | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the adidas AG meeting?
169 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 1 of 47 voted against management (2.1%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by adidas AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for adidas AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing adidas AG with a meeting date within three days of 7 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.