Home / Companies / AIB Group plc / 1 May 2025
AIB Group plc: meeting of 1 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
182 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the AIB Group plc meeting of 1 May 2025. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
14 nominees; 99.2% of reported votes for; 12 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,457 vote records from 152 filers. 0 of the 150 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 0.3% of reported votes for; 148 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
313 vote records from 151 filers. 3 of the 149 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
128 vote records from 51 filers. 1 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
636 vote records from 152 filers. 5 of the 150 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
32 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
267 vote records from 130 filers. 0 of the 128 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,013 vote records from 152 filers. 0 of the 150 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
583 vote records from 153 filers. 0 of the 151 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
958 vote records from 152 filers. 0 of the 150 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
151 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
3 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against | No report | For |
| American Century | For | Against | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | For * | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | Against | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | For | Against | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | Against | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | No report | For |
| Voya | For | Against | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | Against | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against | No report | For |
| Principal | For | Against | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against | No report | For |
| MFS | For | Against | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | Against | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against | No report | For |
| PIMCO | For | Against | No report | For |
| MassMutual | For | Against | For | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the AIB Group plc meeting?
182 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 1 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 1 of 48 voted against management (2.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by AIB Group plc on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for AIB Group plc
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing AIB Group plc with a meeting date within three days of 1 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.