Home / Companies / Akamai Technologies, Inc. / 13 May 2026
Akamai Technologies, Inc.: meeting of 13 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
916 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Akamai Technologies, Inc. meeting of 13 May 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 93.9% of reported votes for; 60 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,711 vote records from 248 filers. 3 of the 243 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,481 vote records from 911 filers. 91 of the 879 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 32 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
637 vote records from 248 filers. 5 of the 243 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
129 vote records from 50 filers. 1 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
104 vote records from 45 filers. 0 of the 43 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,192 vote records from 255 filers. 16 of the 249 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,137 vote records from 246 filers. 2 of the 242 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
To vote upon a shareholder proposal requiring the Company to provide a report on political spending.
627 vote records from 246 filers. 141 of the 241 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| DWS | For | Against * | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Virtus | For | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Akamai Technologies, Inc. meeting?
916 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 91 of 879 voted against management (10.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Akamai Technologies, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Akamai Technologies, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.