Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Aker Carbon Capture AS

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

Aker Carbon Capture AS

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2025

Filers reporting
14year to 30 June 2025
Against management on pay
100.0%2 of 2 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
100.0%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
4across 2 seasons

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

14 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Aker Carbon Capture AS for the year to 30 June 2025, across 3 meetings.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 2 of the 2 filers that reported a position voted against management (100.0%), 91.9 percentage points above the median company on this site (8.1%). By reported shares the figure is 100.0% (median 4.0%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Among the largest fund families, 0 voted with management on pay and 1 voted against: BlackRock and iShares.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
6 Jun 2025year to 30 June 202532not reported
29 Apr 2025year to 30 June 202556100.0%
7 Mar 2025year to 30 June 2025133not reported
29 Apr 2024year to 30 June 202423733.3%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2025Aker Carbon Capture ASMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management100.0%8.1%
Reported shares voted against management100.0%4.0%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,794 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 7 Mar 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

None of the families tracked on this site reported a position on these items.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20242333.3%0.0%
year to 30 June 202514100.0%100.0%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE20833.7%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE14824.0%
COMPENSATION13121.2%
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS396.3%
OTHER396.3%
AUDIT-RELATED355.7%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES172.8%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Aker Carbon Capture AS?

For the year to 30 June 2025, 2 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Aker Carbon Capture AS; 2 voted against management (100.0%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Aker Carbon Capture AS?

No proposal from security holders was reported by enough filers to be shown for the year to 30 June 2025.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Aker Carbon Capture AS reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 30 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,794 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Aker Carbon Capture AS, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026; page built 1 Oct 2026.