Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Bayer AG / 25 Apr 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025160 filers reporting

Bayer AG: meeting of 25 Apr 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

160 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Bayer AG meeting of 25 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 99.0% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

311 vote records from 131 filers. 1 of the 130 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.5% for0.8% against0.8% other0.8% against management131 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

119 vote records from 49 filers. 3 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

83.7% for6.1% against10.2% other6.8% against management49 filers98.0% for2.0% against2.0% against management69,167,385 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

250 vote records from 133 filers. 0 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.5% for0.0% against1.5% other0.0% against management133 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management156,500,161 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

444 vote records from 133 filers. 0 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.2% for0.0% against3.8% other0.0% against management133 filers89.3% for10.6% against0.1% other10.6% against management286,703,172 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

453 vote records from 136 filers. 2 of the 135 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

80.9% for0.0% against19.1% other1.5% against management136 filers81.5% for18.5% against0.1% other18.5% against management285,428,723 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

936 vote records from 133 filers. 0 of the 127 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

62.4% for0.8% against36.8% other0.0% against management133 filers75.1% for21.0% against3.9% other1.3% against management583,569,478 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

291 vote records from 16 filers. 0 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

18.8% for0.0% against81.3% other0.0% against management16 filers50.7% for48.2% against1.1% other0.0% against management11,862,374 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Additional or Amended Shareholder Proposals

22 vote records from 16 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for100.0% against16 filers0.0% for100.0% against10,854,105 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor8. Proposal
VanguardForNo reportForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForNo report
FidelityForNo reportForNo report
DimensionalForNo reportForNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo reportForNo report
American CenturyForNo reportForNo report
Franklin TempletonForNo reportForNo report
InvescoForNo reportForNo report
EquitableForNo reportForNo report
Charles SchwabForNo reportForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportForNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportForNo report
J.P. MorganForForForNo report
Goldman SachsForNo reportForNo report
WisdomTreeForNo reportForNo report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo reportForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForNo report
SEIForNo reportForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportForNo report
ThriventForNo reportForNo report
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportForNo report
VoyaForNo reportForNo report
First TrustForNo reportForNo report
Russell InvestmentsForNo reportForAgainst
NationwideForNo reportForNo report
Victory CapitalForNo reportForNo report
Brighthouse FundsForNo reportForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo reportForNo report
BNY MellonForNo reportForNo report
PrincipalForNo reportForNo report
Capital Group and American FundsForNo reportForNo report
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportForNo report
Global XForNo reportForNo report
MFSForNo reportForNo report
TransamericaForNo reportForNo report
AllianceBernsteinForNo reportForNo report
Hartford FundsForNo reportForAgainst
DWSForNo reportForNo report
PIMCOForNo reportForNo report
AllspringForNo reportForNo report
MassMutualForForForNo report
VanEckForNo reportForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForNo report
Dodge & CoxForNo reportForNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Bayer AG meeting?

160 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 25 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 3 of 44 voted against management (6.8%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Bayer AG on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Bayer AG

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Bayer AG with a meeting date within three days of 25 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.