Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Brenntag SE / 20 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026124 filers reporting

Brenntag SE: meeting of 20 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

124 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Brenntag SE meeting of 20 May 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 82.0% of reported votes for; 26 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

637 vote records from 110 filers. 16 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

80.0% for14.5% against5.5% other15.4% against management110 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

125 vote records from 33 filers. 12 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

39.4% for36.4% against24.2% other42.9% against management33 filers29.4% for70.6% against70.6% against management13,001,563 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

398 vote records from 110 filers. 0 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.9% for0.0% against9.1% other0.0% against management110 filers95.2% for4.6% against0.1% other4.6% against management36,269,646 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

795 vote records from 110 filers. 0 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.5% for0.0% against5.5% other0.0% against management110 filers97.6% for2.3% against0.1% other2.3% against management72,490,636 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

342 vote records from 107 filers. 53 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

26.2% for50.5% against23.4% other52.5% against management107 filers74.3% for25.6% against0.1% other25.5% against management32,029,979 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

526 vote records from 110 filers. 0 of the 100 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.0% for0.0% against10.0% other0.0% against management110 filers74.4% for25.1% against0.5% other0.9% against management45,982,790 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

157 vote records from 13 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.

7.7% for61.5% against30.8% other13 filers0.5% for81.5% against18.0% other1,350,964 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Additional or Amended Shareholder Proposals

27 vote records from 19 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 19 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for100.0% against19 filers0.0% for100.0% against3,729,748 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor8. Proposal
VanguardForNo reportForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *ForNo report
FidelityForNo reportForAgainst
DimensionalForNo reportForNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo reportForNo report
American CenturyForNo reportForNo report
Franklin TempletonForNo reportForNo report
InvescoForNo reportForNo report
EquitableForNo reportForNo report
Charles SchwabAgainst *No reportForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportForNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *ForNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportForNo report
J.P. MorganAgainst *Against *ForNo report
Goldman SachsForNo reportForNo report
WisdomTreeForNo reportForNo report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo reportForAgainst
Jackson National fundsSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no voteNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst *ForNo report
SEIAgainst *No reportForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportForNo report
ThriventForNo reportForNo report
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportForNo report
VoyaForNo reportForNo report
First TrustForNo reportForNo report
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *No reportForAgainst
NationwideAgainst *No reportForNo report
Victory CapitalForNo reportForAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForNo reportForNo report
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo reportForNo report
BNY MellonForNo reportForNo report
PrincipalSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no voteNo report
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportForAgainst
Global XAgainst *No reportForAgainst
TransamericaForNo reportForNo report
AllianceBernsteinForNo reportForNo report
Hartford FundsForNo reportForAgainst
DWSForNo reportForNo report
PIMCOForNo reportForNo report
MassMutualForNo reportForNo report
Harbor FundsForAgainst *ForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForNo reportForNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Brenntag SE meeting?

124 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 20 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 12 of 28 voted against management (42.9%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Brenntag SE on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Brenntag SE

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Brenntag SE with a meeting date within three days of 20 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.