Home / Companies / CEZ as / 1 Jun 2026
CEZ as: meeting of 1 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
66 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CEZ as meeting of 1 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 4.3% of reported votes for; 53 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
300 vote records from 57 filers. 52 of the 56 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
49 vote records from 21 filers. 15 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
209 vote records from 57 filers. 3 of the 56 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
90 vote records from 57 filers. 0 of the 56 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
90 vote records from 57 filers. 0 of the 56 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
68 vote records from 45 filers. 36 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
367 vote records from 57 filers. 0 of the 56 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
90 vote records from 57 filers. 3 of the 56 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
51 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | Against * |
| Fidelity | Against * | No report | For |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report | For |
| American Century | Against * | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report | For |
| Invesco | Against * | No report | For |
| Equitable | Against * | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | Against * | Split or no vote |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Against * | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | Against * | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | Against * | Split or no vote |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | No report | For |
| Voya | Against * | No report | For |
| First Trust | Against * | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | Against * | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | Against * | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | For |
| Harbor Funds | Against * | Against * | Split or no vote |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CEZ as meeting?
66 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 1 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 15 of 18 voted against management (83.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CEZ as on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CEZ as
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CEZ as with a meeting date within three days of 1 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.