Home / Companies / Chubb Limited / 15 May 2025
Chubb Limited: meeting of 15 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,583 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Chubb Limited meeting of 15 May 2025. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
19 nominees; 80.2% of reported votes for; 210 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
21,876 vote records from 402 filers. 9 of the 392 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,713 vote records from 1,559 filers. 77 of the 1,474 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 85 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
2,570 vote records from 401 filers. 9 of the 392 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
855 vote records from 342 filers. 1 of the 335 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
3,143 vote records from 393 filers. 2 of the 382 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
3,047 vote records from 418 filers. 11 of the 406 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
6,167 vote records from 398 filers. 3 of the 389 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
180 vote records from 78 filers. 9 of the 76 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
486 vote records from 95 filers. 0 of the 89 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal on Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions reporting
1,150 vote records from 388 filers. 59 of the 377 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | Against * | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against * |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Chubb Limited meeting?
1,583 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 77 of 1,474 voted against management (5.2%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Chubb Limited on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Chubb Limited
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Chubb Limited with a meeting date within three days of 15 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.