Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Cisco Systems, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXCSCO · SEC company no. 858877

Cisco Systems, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
2,103year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
7.5%151 of 2,016 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
6.2%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
6across 3 seasons
89.2% for6.7% against4.1% other7.5% against management2,075 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

2,103 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Cisco Systems, Inc. for the year to 30 June 2026, across 3 meetings.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 151 of the 2,016 filers that reported a position voted against management (7.5%), close to the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 6.2% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
16 Dec 2025year to 30 June 20262,08867.5%
17 Oct 2025year to 30 June 2026310.0%
9 Dec 2024year to 30 June 20252,009525.1%
12 Sep 2024year to 30 June 2025410.0%
6 Dec 2023year to 30 June 20242,011727.9%
12 Jun 2023year to 30 June 20247320.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Cisco Systems, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management7.5%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management6.2%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 16 Dec 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst
FidelityForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainst
American CenturyForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainst
InvescoForAgainst
EquitableForAgainst
Charles SchwabForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *Against
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *Against
J.P. MorganForAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst
SEIForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst
ThriventForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst
VoyaForAgainst
First TrustForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst
NationwideForAgainst
Victory CapitalForAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainst
PrincipalForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst
Global XForAgainst
MFSForAgainst
TransamericaForAgainst
Federated HermesForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForAgainst
Hartford FundsForAgainst
DWSForAgainst
PIMCOForFor *
AllspringForAgainst
MassMutualForAgainst
Harbor FundsForAgainst
VirtusAbstain or withhold *Against
VanEckForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForAgainst
Janus HendersonForNo report
Neuberger BermanForAgainst
American BeaconForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst
Lord AbbettForNo report
Dodge & CoxForNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo report
BairdForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20242,02927.9%withheld
year to 30 June 20252,04325.1%21.1%
year to 30 June 20262,1037.5%6.2%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS38,91057.4%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES17,88526.4%
AUDIT-RELATED4,3296.4%
COMPENSATION3,7385.5%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION1,4712.2%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES1,4512.1%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE160.0%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE100.0%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Cisco Systems, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2,016 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Cisco Systems, Inc.; 151 voted against management (7.5%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Cisco Systems, Inc.?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 1.7% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Cisco Systems, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Cisco Systems, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.