Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA / 10 Sep 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026227 filers reporting

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA: meeting of 10 Sep 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

227 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA meeting of 10 Sep 2025. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

20 nominees; 81.1% of reported votes for; 139 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

7,953 vote records from 222 filers. 7 of the 189 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 33 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.0% for3.2% against14.9% other3.7% against management222 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

29 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

66.7% for0.0% against33.3% other0.0% against management6 filers51.9% for48.1% against49.7% against management4,879,728 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

423 vote records from 221 filers. 0 of the 188 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 33 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.1% for0.0% against14.9% other0.0% against management221 filers97.4% for0.0% against2.6% other0.0% against management79,982,879 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

420 vote records from 219 filers. 0 of the 186 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 33 filers reported this item without a management mark.

84.9% for0.0% against15.1% other0.0% against management219 filers97.4% for0.0% against2.6% other0.0% against management79,936,679 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,261 vote records from 220 filers. 2 of the 187 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 33 filers reported this item without a management mark.

84.1% for0.9% against15.0% other1.1% against management220 filers83.3% for14.1% against2.6% other14.4% against management239,946,441 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

2,459 vote records from 222 filers. 0 of the 189 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 33 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.9% for0.0% against17.1% other0.0% against management222 filers71.1% for22.4% against6.4% other22.9% against management442,052,421 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

63 vote records from 27 filers. 1 of the 25 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

88.9% for3.7% against7.4% other4.0% against management27 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.2% against management11,917,378 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

221 vote records from 30 filers. 1 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

30.0% for3.3% against66.7% other3.7% against management30 filers52.5% for26.3% against21.3% other25.3% against management5,495,541 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
9

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

10 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers90.0% for10.0% against0.0% against management840,880 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors3. Auditor
VanguardForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForFor
FidelityForFor
DimensionalForFor
State Street and SPDRForFor
American CenturyForFor
Franklin TempletonForFor
InvescoForFor
EquitableForFor
Charles SchwabSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Nuveen and TIAAForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor
J.P. MorganForFor
Goldman SachsForFor
WisdomTreeForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForFor
Jackson National fundsForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
SEISplit or no voteSplit or no vote
T. Rowe PriceForFor
ThriventForFor
Lincoln FinancialForFor
VoyaAgainst *For
First TrustForFor
Russell InvestmentsSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
NationwideForFor
Victory CapitalForFor
Brighthouse FundsForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor
BNY MellonForFor
PrincipalForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForFor
Pacific Life fundsForFor
Global XSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
MFSForFor
TransamericaForFor
Federated HermesForFor
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *For
Hartford FundsForFor
PIMCOForFor
MassMutualForFor
Harbor FundsForFor
VanEckSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForFor
Janus HendersonForFor
Neuberger BermanSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
American BeaconSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForFor
Lord AbbettForFor
Harris Associates and OakmarkForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA meeting?

227 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Sep 2025. On say-on-pay, 0 of 6 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA with a meeting date within three days of 10 Sep 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.