Hermes International SCA: meeting of 30 Apr 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

249 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Hermes International SCA meeting of 30 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

4 nominees; 57.0% of reported votes for; 134 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,637 vote records from 205 filers. 101 of the 205 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

49.3% for49.8% against1.0% other49.3% against management205 filers

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

354 vote records from 70 filers. 35 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

42.9% for45.7% against11.4% other52.2% against management70 filers76.8% for19.7% against3.5% other23.1% against management3,017,978 reported shares

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

135 vote records from 37 filers. 1 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

89.2% for2.7% against8.1% other2.9% against management37 filers

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,348 vote records from 208 filers. 0 of the 206 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other0.0% against management208 filers91.3% for8.7% against8.7% against management17,488,951 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

2,686 vote records from 208 filers. 144 of the 206 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

27.4% for70.2% against2.4% other69.9% against management208 filers64.6% for35.3% against0.0% other35.3% against management34,339,727 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,807 vote records from 208 filers. 0 of the 206 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.6% for0.0% against1.4% other0.0% against management208 filers88.2% for11.8% against11.7% against management20,407,676 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

761 vote records from 167 filers. 0 of the 165 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for0.0% against1.8% other0.0% against management167 filers99.1% for0.9% against0.9% against management3,822,745 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Directors	2. Say-on-pay	3. Auditor
Vanguard	For	For	No report
BlackRock and iShares	For	No report	No report
Fidelity	For	No report	For
Dimensional	Against *	No report	No report
State Street and SPDR	Against *	No report	No report
American Century	Against *	No report	No report
Franklin Templeton	Against *	No report	For
Invesco	For	No report	No report
Equitable	For	No report	No report
Charles Schwab	For	No report	For
Nuveen and TIAA	Against *	No report	No report
John Hancock and Manulife	Against *	Against *	No report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert	For	No report	No report
J.P. Morgan	For	For	No report
Goldman Sachs	Against *	No report	No report
WisdomTree	Against *	No report	No report
PGIM and Prudential	For	No report	For
Jackson National funds	For	For	No report
Northern Trust and FlexShares	For	Against *	No report
SEI	For	No report	For
T. Rowe Price	Against *	No report	No report
Thrivent	Against *	No report	No report
Lincoln Financial	Against	No report	No report
Voya	Against *	No report	No report
First Trust	Against *	No report	No report
Russell Investments	For	No report	For
Nationwide	Against *	No report	No report
Victory Capital	Against *	No report	No report
Brighthouse Funds	Against	No report	For
Columbia Threadneedle	For	No report	No report
BNY Mellon	For	No report	No report
Principal	Against *	No report	For
Capital Group and American Funds	For	No report	No report
Pacific Life funds	Against *	No report	No report
Global X	For	No report	For
MFS	Against *	No report	No report
Transamerica	Against *	No report	No report
Federated Hermes	For	No report	For
AllianceBernstein	Split or no vote	No report	No report
Hartford Funds	Against *	No report	For
PIMCO	Against *	No report	No report
Allspring	Against *	No report	No report
MassMutual	Against *	No report	No report
Harbor Funds	Against *	Against *	No report
Lord Abbett	Against *	No report	No report
Artisan Partners	For	No report	No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Hermes International SCA meeting?

249 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 35 of 67 voted against management (52.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Hermes International SCA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Hermes International SCA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Hermes International SCA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.