Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Hermes International SCA / 30 Apr 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025266 filers reporting

Hermes International SCA: meeting of 30 Apr 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

266 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Hermes International SCA meeting of 30 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

6 nominees; 80.4% of reported votes for; 120 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

2,628 vote records from 209 filers. 7 of the 209 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

93.3% for3.3% against3.3% other3.3% against management209 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

847 vote records from 101 filers. 42 of the 95 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

31.7% for41.6% against26.7% other44.2% against management101 filers59.0% for41.0% against0.0% other41.0% against management19,598,125 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

111 vote records from 47 filers. 20 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

51.1% for42.6% against6.4% other45.5% against management47 filers33.5% for66.5% against66.5% against management1,113,878 reported shares
4

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

821 vote records from 210 filers. 159 of the 207 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

21.0% for76.7% against2.4% other76.8% against management210 filers32.6% for67.4% against67.3% against management9,669,428 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

4,011 vote records from 212 filers. 113 of the 209 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

38.2% for53.8% against8.0% other54.1% against management212 filers55.8% for44.2% against44.1% against management43,503,538 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

2,692 vote records from 215 filers. 143 of the 212 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

29.8% for67.9% against2.3% other67.5% against management215 filers66.7% for33.3% against32.8% against management28,947,719 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

2,161 vote records from 212 filers. 1 of the 209 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for0.5% against1.4% other0.5% against management212 filers87.3% for12.7% against0.0% other12.7% against management20,876,115 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

475 vote records from 34 filers. 1 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

88.2% for2.9% against8.8% other3.2% against management34 filers96.4% for3.6% against3.6% against management1,808,808 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForAgainst *
FidelityForNo reportFor
DimensionalSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo reportNo report
American CenturyForNo reportNo report
Franklin TempletonForNo reportNo report
InvescoForNo reportNo report
EquitableForNo reportNo report
Charles SchwabForNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *No report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportNo report
J.P. MorganForAgainst *Against *
Goldman SachsForNo reportNo report
WisdomTreeForNo reportNo report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst *No report
SEIForNo reportFor
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportNo report
ThriventForNo reportNo report
Lincoln FinancialForSplit or no voteAgainst *
VoyaForNo reportNo report
First TrustForNo reportNo report
Russell InvestmentsForNo reportFor
NationwideForNo reportNo report
Victory CapitalForNo reportNo report
Brighthouse FundsForNo reportFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo reportNo report
BNY MellonForNo reportNo report
PrincipalForNo reportNo report
Capital Group and American FundsForNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportNo report
Global XForNo reportFor
MFSForNo reportNo report
TransamericaForNo reportNo report
Federated HermesForNo reportFor
AllianceBernsteinSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
Hartford FundsForNo reportFor
DWSForNo reportNo report
PIMCOForNo reportNo report
MassMutualForAgainst *No report
Harbor FundsForAgainst *No report
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForNo reportNo report
American BeaconForNo reportNo report
Artisan PartnersForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Hermes International SCA meeting?

266 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 42 of 95 voted against management (44.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Hermes International SCA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Hermes International SCA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Hermes International SCA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.