Vote Scores

Home / Companies / INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC / 14 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024212 filers reporting

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC: meeting of 14 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

212 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC meeting of 14 May 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

12 nominees; 95.5% of reported votes for; 40 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,336 vote records from 122 filers. 0 of the 122 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management122 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

225 vote records from 101 filers. 3 of the 94 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

87.1% for3.0% against9.9% other3.2% against management101 filers81.0% for0.1% against18.9% other0.1% against management10,758,912 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

558 vote records from 122 filers. 0 of the 122 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

99.2% for0.0% against0.8% other0.0% against management122 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management84,136,964 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,082 vote records from 122 filers. 0 of the 122 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

96.7% for0.0% against3.3% other0.0% against management122 filers94.5% for5.5% against5.5% against management167,101,440 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

507 vote records from 124 filers. 7 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

58.1% for5.6% against36.3% other5.6% against management124 filers88.6% for11.4% against11.4% against management78,218,997 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

225 vote records from 108 filers. 0 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management108 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management36,067,622 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

266 vote records from 116 filers. 0 of the 116 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management116 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management41,676,616 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

109 vote records from 22 filers. 0 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

95.5% for0.0% against4.5% other0.0% against management22 filers95.0% for0.0% against5.0% other1.3% against management9,374,506 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForNo reportFor
FidelityForNo reportFor
DimensionalForNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRForNo reportFor
American CenturyForNo reportFor
Franklin TempletonForNo reportFor
InvescoForNo reportFor
EquitableForNo reportFor
Charles SchwabForNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportFor
ProShares and ProFundsForNo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForNo reportFor
PGIM and PrudentialForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForNo reportFor
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportFor
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportFor
VoyaForNo reportFor
Russell InvestmentsForNo reportFor
NationwideForNo reportFor
Victory CapitalForNo reportFor
Brighthouse FundsForNo reportFor
Guggenheim and RydexForNo reportFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo reportFor
BNY MellonForNo reportFor
PrincipalForNo reportFor
Capital Group and American FundsForNo reportFor
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportFor
Global XForNo reportFor
MFSForNo reportFor
Federated HermesForNo reportFor
Hartford FundsForNo reportFor
DWSForNo reportFor
PIMCOForNo reportSplit or no vote
AllspringForNo reportFor
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
Harbor FundsForForFor
VanEckForNo reportFor
Neuberger BermanForNo reportFor
American BeaconForNo reportFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC meeting?

212 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 3 of 94 voted against management (3.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.