Home / Companies / INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC / 13 May 2025
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC: meeting of 13 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
211 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC meeting of 13 May 2025. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 93.5% of reported votes for; 26 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,833 vote records from 124 filers. 4 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
148 vote records from 114 filers. 3 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
478 vote records from 124 filers. 0 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
38 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
902 vote records from 124 filers. 0 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
187 vote records from 96 filers. 1 of the 96 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
212 vote records from 106 filers. 0 of the 106 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
183 vote records from 94 filers. 0 of the 94 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
37 vote records from 26 filers. 1 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
To authorise the Company to make political donations and expenditure
43 vote records from 29 filers. 0 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | No report |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | For | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | No report |
| Voya | Against * | No report | For | No report |
| First Trust | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | No report |
| Principal | For | No report | For | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| Global X | For | No report | For | No report |
| MFS | For | No report | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | For | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| DWS | For | No report | For | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | No report |
| Allspring | For | No report | For | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | For | No report |
| VanEck | For | No report | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For | No report |
| American Beacon | For | No report | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC meeting?
211 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 3 of 108 voted against management (2.8%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.