Home / Companies / Ipsen SA / 21 May 2025
Ipsen SA: meeting of 21 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
119 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ipsen SA meeting of 21 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 65.1% of reported votes for; 96 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
844 vote records from 102 filers. 13 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
161 vote records from 26 filers. 4 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
37 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,945 vote records from 102 filers. 13 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,820 vote records from 103 filers. 1 of the 102 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,597 vote records from 102 filers. 0 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
130 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | No report | For | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | No report |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | No report |
| Equitable | Against * | No report | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | No report |
| Thrivent | For | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | No report |
| Voya | Against * | No report | No report |
| First Trust | For | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | No report |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | No report |
| Federated Hermes | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Ipsen SA meeting?
119 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 4 of 24 voted against management (16.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ipsen SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Ipsen SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ipsen SA with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.