Home / Companies / Ipsen SA / 13 May 2026
Ipsen SA: meeting of 13 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
157 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ipsen SA meeting of 13 May 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 63.6% of reported votes for; 92 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,092 vote records from 135 filers. 21 of the 134 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
398 vote records from 48 filers. 0 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
71 vote records from 30 filers. 0 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
211 vote records from 99 filers. 0 of the 99 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
606 vote records from 135 filers. 0 of the 134 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,667 vote records from 135 filers. 1 of the 134 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,254 vote records from 135 filers. 0 of the 134 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
183 vote records from 16 filers. 0 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | No report |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report | No report |
| American Century | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | No report |
| Equitable | Against * | No report | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | Against | No report | No report |
| Voya | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | No report |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | No report | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | No report |
| Principal | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | Against * | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| PIMCO | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | Split or no vote | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Ipsen SA meeting?
157 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 44 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ipsen SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Ipsen SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ipsen SA with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.