Home / Companies / Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA
Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA
How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026
- Filers reporting
- 140year to 30 June 2026
- Against management on pay
- 0.0%0 of 2 reporting filers
- Same, by reported shares
- 0.0%shares reported on Form N-PX
- Meetings on file
- 3across 3 seasons
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
140 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA for the year to 30 June 2026, across one meeting.
On the advisory vote on executive pay, 0 of the 2 filers that reported a position voted against management (0.0%), 6.6 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 0.0% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.
Meetings
| Meeting date | Season | Filers reporting | Items | Against management on pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Apr 2026 | year to 30 June 2026 | 140 | 8 | 0.0% |
| 24 Apr 2025 | year to 30 June 2025 | 134 | 10 | 16.7% |
| 18 Apr 2024 | year to 30 June 2024 | 151 | 4 | not reported |
Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.
Say-on-pay: this company and the median
| year to 30 June 2026 | Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA | Median company |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting filers voting against management | 0.0% | 6.6% |
| Reported shares voted against management | 0.0% | 2.9% |
Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.
How the largest families voted
Meeting of 23 Apr 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.
| Family | Proposal A | Proposal B |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against |
| American Century | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | Abstain or withhold |
| Equitable | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against |
| Voya | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against |
| Principal | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| MFS | For | For |
| Transamerica | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against |
| PIMCO | For | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | For | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
- Proposal A: Appraise Management and Supervision of Company and Approve Vote of Confidence to Corporate Bodies
- Proposal B: Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
By season
| Season | Filers reporting | Against management on pay, filers | By reported shares | Say-on-pay split |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| year to 30 June 2024 | 151 | not reported | not reported | |
| year to 30 June 2025 | 134 | 16.7% | 1.9% | |
| year to 30 June 2026 | 140 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Category mix
Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.
| Category | Vote records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 2,132 | 41.4% |
| AUDIT-RELATED | 805 | 15.6% |
| OTHER | 758 | 14.7% |
| CAPITAL STRUCTURE | 748 | 14.5% |
| COMPENSATION | 358 | 7.0% |
| DIRECTOR ELECTIONS | 339 | 6.6% |
| SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES | 10 | 0.2% |
Questions
How did large funds vote at Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA?
For the year to 30 June 2026, 2 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA; 0 voted against management (0.0%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.
Were there shareholder proposals at Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA?
Filers reported 2 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 23.4% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.
Is this the meeting result?
No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA reports on Form 8-K.
Where does the data come from?
From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.