Home / Companies / Loblaw Companies Limited / 2 May 2024
Loblaw Companies Limited: meeting of 2 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
134 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Loblaw Companies Limited meeting of 2 May 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 98.7% of reported votes for; 10 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,076 vote records from 97 filers. 0 of the 97 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
71 vote records from 48 filers. 6 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
173 vote records from 97 filers. 0 of the 97 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
195 vote records from 85 filers. 3 of the 85 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
10 vote records from 9 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Hold Annual Meetings of the Company in Person with Virtual Meetings as Complements
172 vote records from 96 filers. 64 of the 96 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | No report | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | For * |
| Voya | For | No report | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | For * |
| MFS | For | No report | For | For * |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | For * |
| DWS | For | No report | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Loblaw Companies Limited meeting?
134 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 6 of 44 voted against management (13.6%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Loblaw Companies Limited on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Loblaw Companies Limited
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Loblaw Companies Limited with a meeting date within three days of 2 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.