Home / Companies / Lotus Bakeries NV / 13 May 2025
Lotus Bakeries NV: meeting of 13 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
90 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Lotus Bakeries NV meeting of 13 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
5 nominees; 38.2% of reported votes for; 71 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
706 vote records from 74 filers. 59 of the 72 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
72 vote records from 23 filers. 15 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
406 vote records from 74 filers. 0 of the 72 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
124 vote records from 65 filers. 0 of the 65 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
269 vote records from 74 filers. 66 of the 72 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
315 vote records from 74 filers. 0 of the 72 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
117 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | No report | Against * | No report |
| Fidelity | Against * | No report | For |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report | For |
| American Century | Against * | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report | For |
| Invesco | Against * | No report | For |
| Equitable | Against * | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | No report | For |
| Thrivent | Against * | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | No report | For |
| Voya | Against * | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote * | No report | Split or no vote |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | No report | For |
| Principal | Against * | No report | For |
| Transamerica | Against * | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | For |
| DWS | Against * | No report | For |
| PIMCO | Against * | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Lotus Bakeries NV meeting?
90 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 15 of 19 voted against management (78.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Lotus Bakeries NV on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Lotus Bakeries NV
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Lotus Bakeries NV with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.