Home / Companies / Lotus Bakeries NV / 12 May 2026
Lotus Bakeries NV: meeting of 12 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
102 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Lotus Bakeries NV meeting of 12 May 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 37.2% of reported votes for; 73 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
336 vote records from 87 filers. 37 of the 84 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
79 vote records from 31 filers. 22 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
139 vote records from 77 filers. 0 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
268 vote records from 77 filers. 60 of the 76 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
323 vote records from 87 filers. 4 of the 84 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
121 vote records from 71 filers. 61 of the 70 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
361 vote records from 87 filers. 0 of the 84 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
103 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | Against * | No report | For |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report | For |
| American Century | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| Invesco | Against * | No report | For |
| Equitable | Against * | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | No report | For |
| Voya | Against * | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| Principal | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| Transamerica | Against * | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | For |
| PIMCO | Split or no vote | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Lotus Bakeries NV meeting?
102 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 22 of 26 voted against management (84.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Lotus Bakeries NV on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Lotus Bakeries NV
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Lotus Bakeries NV with a meeting date within three days of 12 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.