Home / Companies / OVS SpA / 29 May 2026
OVS SpA: meeting of 29 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
46 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the OVS SpA meeting of 29 May 2026. Their records fall into 13 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 46.6% of reported votes for; 10 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
56 vote records from 13 filers. 1 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
3 nominees; 67.5% of reported votes for; 23 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
110 vote records from 27 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 27 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
50 vote records from 14 filers. 5 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
110 vote records from 36 filers. 0 of the 36 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
216 vote records from 36 filers. 25 of the 36 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
172 vote records from 36 filers. 0 of the 36 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
21 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
34 vote records from 23 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Fix Board Terms for Directors
34 vote records from 23 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Fix Number of Directors
34 vote records from 23 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)
32 vote records from 21 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)
32 vote records from 21 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
16 vote records from 4 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal | 12. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Thrivent | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Voya | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the OVS SpA meeting?
46 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 5 of 10 voted against management (50.0%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by OVS SpA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for OVS SpA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing OVS SpA with a meeting date within three days of 29 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.