Home / Companies / Power Corporation of Canada / 9 May 2024
Power Corporation of Canada: meeting of 9 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
161 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Power Corporation of Canada meeting of 9 May 2024. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
14 nominees; 89.8% of reported votes for; 61 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,890 vote records from 86 filers. 0 of the 86 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
123 vote records from 84 filers. 3 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
135 vote records from 86 filers. 1 of the 86 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
139 vote records from 77 filers. 2 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
45 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Disclose Language Fluency of Executives
127 vote records from 80 filers. 2 of the 80 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Approve Incentive Compensation for All Employees Based on ESG Targets
128 vote records from 82 filers. 3 of the 82 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Advisory Vote on Environmental Policies
129 vote records from 82 filers. 18 of the 82 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Disclosure of Financed Emissions
127 vote records from 81 filers. 21 of the 81 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Hold Annual Meetings of the Company in Person with Virtual Meetings as Complements
127 vote records from 81 filers. 36 of the 81 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
27 vote records from 8 filers. 1 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Equitable | For | No report | Abstain or withhold * | Against | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Power Corporation of Canada meeting?
161 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 3 of 77 voted against management (3.9%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Power Corporation of Canada on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Power Corporation of Canada
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Power Corporation of Canada with a meeting date within three days of 9 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.