Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Power Corporation of Canada

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

Power Corporation of Canada

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
216year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
2.1%3 of 142 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
1.1%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
91.3% for2.7% against6.0% other2.1% against management150 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

216 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Power Corporation of Canada for the year to 30 June 2026, across one meeting.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 3 of the 142 filers that reported a position voted against management (2.1%), 4.5 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 1.1% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

All 17 of the largest fund families that reported a say-on-pay vote here voted with management.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
13 May 2026year to 30 June 202621582.1%
14 May 2025year to 30 June 2025176106.0%
9 May 2024year to 30 June 2024161113.9%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Power Corporation of CanadaMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management2.1%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management1.1%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 13 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal B
VanguardNo reportAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainst
FidelityNo reportAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRNo reportAgainstAgainst
American CenturyNo reportAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonNo reportAgainstAgainst
InvescoNo reportAgainstAgainst
EquitableNo reportAgainstFor *
Charles SchwabForAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAANo reportAgainstFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportAgainstFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeNo reportAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForNo reportNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainstAgainst
SEIForAgainstAgainst
ThriventNo reportAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportNo report
First TrustForAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalNo reportAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleNo reportAgainstAgainst
BNY MellonNo reportAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportAgainstAgainst
TransamericaNo reportAgainstFor *
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsForAgainstAgainst
PIMCONo reportAgainstAgainst
AllspringNo reportAgainstAgainst
Neuberger BermanForAgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForNo reportNo report
BairdForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241633.9%2.3%
year to 30 June 20251766.0%2.9%
year to 30 June 20262162.1%1.1%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS5,75263.8%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES6467.2%
COMPENSATION5826.5%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE5486.1%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE4995.5%
AUDIT-RELATED4184.6%
OTHER4164.6%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES1581.8%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Power Corporation of Canada?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 142 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Power Corporation of Canada; 3 voted against management (2.1%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Power Corporation of Canada?

Filers reported 2 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 0.0% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Power Corporation of Canada reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Power Corporation of Canada, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.