Home / Companies / Power Corporation of Canada / 14 May 2025
Power Corporation of Canada: meeting of 14 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
176 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Power Corporation of Canada meeting of 14 May 2025. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 88.2% of reported votes for; 50 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,639 vote records from 83 filers. 1 of the 83 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 0.0% of reported votes for; 11 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
25 vote records from 11 filers. 0 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
225 vote records from 121 filers. 7 of the 117 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
126 vote records from 83 filers. 2 of the 83 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
220 vote records from 87 filers. 0 of the 87 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
184 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Advisory Vote on Environmental Policies
102 vote records from 72 filers. 11 of the 72 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Adopt Advanced Generative AI Systems Voluntary Code of Conduct
101 vote records from 71 filers. 7 of the 71 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Disclosure of Language Fluency of Employees
96 vote records from 68 filers. 0 of the 68 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
57 vote records from 12 filers. 1 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | For | For | Against | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | No report | Abstain or withhold * | For * | For * | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | No report | For | For * | For * | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against | For | For | Against | Against | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| First Trust | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | No report | For | For * | For * | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Allspring | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Power Corporation of Canada meeting?
176 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 7 of 117 voted against management (6.0%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Power Corporation of Canada on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Power Corporation of Canada
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Power Corporation of Canada with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.