Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Proximus SA / 17 Apr 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 202472 filers reporting

Proximus SA: meeting of 17 Apr 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

72 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Proximus SA meeting of 17 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

4 nominees; 91.4% of reported votes for; 13 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

400 vote records from 63 filers. 1 of the 55 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.7% for0.0% against14.3% other1.8% against management63 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

18 vote records from 14 filers. 7 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

35.7% for50.0% against14.3% other58.3% against management14 filers22.9% for77.1% against77.1% against management3,652,100 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

259 vote records from 63 filers. 0 of the 55 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

87.3% for0.0% against12.7% other0.0% against management63 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.2% other0.0% against management48,717,523 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

85 vote records from 51 filers. 0 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.0% for0.0% against2.0% other0.0% against management51 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.0% against management19,293,732 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

194 vote records from 64 filers. 35 of the 56 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

23.4% for56.3% against20.3% other62.5% against management64 filers37.1% for62.7% against0.1% other62.8% against management39,095,172 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

230 vote records from 58 filers. 0 of the 55 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.4% for0.0% against8.6% other0.0% against management58 filers91.2% for8.5% against0.3% other8.5% against management49,586,094 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

109 vote records from 13 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

38.5% for0.0% against61.5% other0.0% against management13 filers95.6% for0.0% against4.4% other0.0% against management641,441 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesForNo reportFor
FidelityForNo reportFor
DimensionalForNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRForNo reportFor
American CenturyForNo reportFor
Franklin TempletonForNo reportFor
InvescoForNo reportFor
Charles SchwabForNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportFor
J.P. MorganNo reportAgainst *No report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForNo reportFor
First TrustForNo reportFor
Russell InvestmentsForNo reportFor
Victory CapitalForNo reportFor
Brighthouse FundsSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo reportFor
BNY MellonForNo reportFor
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportFor
Global XForNo reportFor
AllianceBernsteinForNo reportFor
Hartford FundsForNo reportFor
PIMCOForNo reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Proximus SA meeting?

72 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 17 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 7 of 12 voted against management (58.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Proximus SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Proximus SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Proximus SA with a meeting date within three days of 17 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.