Home / Companies / Proximus SA / 16 Apr 2025
Proximus SA: meeting of 16 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
65 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Proximus SA meeting of 16 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 67.8% of reported votes for; 47 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
400 vote records from 58 filers. 6 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
72 vote records from 19 filers. 7 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
348 vote records from 58 filers. 0 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
77 vote records from 46 filers. 0 of the 45 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
177 vote records from 58 filers. 40 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
150 vote records from 58 filers. 2 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
57 vote records from 11 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | For | For |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Proximus SA meeting?
65 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 7 of 10 voted against management (70.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Proximus SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Proximus SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Proximus SA with a meeting date within three days of 16 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.