Vote Scores

Home / Companies / PUMA SE / 21 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025107 filers reporting

PUMA SE: meeting of 21 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

107 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the PUMA SE meeting of 21 May 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 78.6% of reported votes for; 2 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

14 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

60.0% for0.0% against40.0% other0.0% against management5 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

86 vote records from 29 filers. 2 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.8% for6.9% against10.3% other7.7% against management29 filers99.1% for0.9% against0.9% against management7,959,191 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

330 vote records from 92 filers. 0 of the 91 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.9% for0.0% against1.1% other0.0% against management92 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management24,256,220 reported shares
4

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

146 vote records from 81 filers. 0 of the 81 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management81 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management11,558,719 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

352 vote records from 92 filers. 0 of the 91 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.9% for0.0% against1.1% other0.0% against management92 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management24,825,611 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

306 vote records from 89 filers. 1 of the 88 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.8% for1.1% against1.1% other1.1% against management89 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management22,797,147 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

340 vote records from 91 filers. 0 of the 87 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.1% for0.0% against9.9% other0.0% against management91 filers99.5% for0.2% against0.2% other0.2% against management23,364,421 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

114 vote records from 11 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other11 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardNo reportNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityNo reportNo reportFor
DimensionalNo reportNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRNo reportNo reportFor
American CenturyNo reportNo reportFor
Franklin TempletonNo reportNo reportFor
InvescoNo reportNo reportFor
EquitableNo reportNo reportFor
Charles SchwabNo reportNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAANo reportNo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeNo reportForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportNo reportFor
J.P. MorganSplit or no voteForFor
Goldman SachsNo reportNo reportFor
WisdomTreeNo reportNo reportFor
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsNo reportForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportForFor
T. Rowe PriceNo reportNo reportFor
ThriventNo reportNo reportFor
Lincoln FinancialNo reportNo reportFor
VoyaNo reportNo reportFor
Russell InvestmentsNo reportNo reportFor
NationwideNo reportNo reportFor
Brighthouse FundsNo reportNo reportFor
Columbia ThreadneedleNo reportNo reportFor
BNY MellonNo reportNo reportFor
PrincipalNo reportNo reportFor
TransamericaNo reportNo reportFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportNo reportFor
DWSNo reportNo reportFor
MassMutualNo reportForFor
American BeaconNo reportNo reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the PUMA SE meeting?

107 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 2 of 26 voted against management (7.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by PUMA SE on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for PUMA SE

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing PUMA SE with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.