Vote Scores

Home / Companies / RB Global, Inc. / 7 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024602 filers reporting

RB Global, Inc.: meeting of 7 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

602 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the RB Global, Inc. meeting of 7 May 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 97.8% of reported votes for; 17 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,633 vote records from 163 filers. 1 of the 162 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for0.6% against1.2% other0.6% against management163 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

876 vote records from 587 filers. 124 of the 566 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

74.4% for21.5% against4.1% other21.9% against management587 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

330 vote records from 162 filers. 1 of the 161 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

98.1% for0.6% against1.2% other0.6% against management162 filers
4

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

241 vote records from 118 filers. 54 of the 118 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

53.4% for45.8% against0.8% other45.8% against management118 filers92.2% for7.8% against0.0% other7.8% against management44,281,419 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

37 vote records from 22 filers. 6 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

72.7% for27.3% against27.3% against management22 filers69.5% for30.5% against30.5% against management8,361,480 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

18 vote records from 12 filers. 1 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

75.0% for16.7% against8.3% other8.3% against management12 filers67.1% for32.9% against0.0% other4.2% against management937,371 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

46 vote records from 25 filers. 0 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

96.0% for0.0% against4.0% other0.0% against management25 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management5,234,796 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

40 vote records from 9 filers. 2 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

22.2% for22.2% against55.6% other50.0% against management9 filers99.7% for0.3% against0.3% against management1,277,258 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
9

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management667 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForAgainst *For
Goldman SachsForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *For
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForAgainst *For
MFSForForFor
TransamericaForForFor
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
Hartford FundsForForFor
DWSNo reportForNo report
PIMCOForForFor
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
VirtusForForFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo report
Janus HendersonForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportAgainst *No report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the RB Global, Inc. meeting?

602 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 124 of 566 voted against management (21.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by RB Global, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for RB Global, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing RB Global, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 7 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.