Home / Companies / Rubis SCA / 11 Jun 2024
Rubis SCA: meeting of 11 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
75 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Rubis SCA meeting of 11 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 12 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
5 nominees; 94.1% of reported votes for; 5 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
471 vote records from 61 filers. 0 of the 59 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
8 nominees; 14.3% of reported votes for; 57 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
669 vote records from 58 filers. 2 of the 56 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
128 vote records from 23 filers. 0 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
30 vote records from 13 filers. 0 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
30 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
180 vote records from 61 filers. 0 of the 59 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
760 vote records from 61 filers. 0 of the 59 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
555 vote records from 53 filers. 0 of the 51 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
171 vote records from 47 filers. 0 of the 46 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (A)
9 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (B)
9 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (C)
9 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal | 12. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Dimensional | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| American Century | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Invesco | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Equitable | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against | For | No report | Against | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| WisdomTree | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against | For | No report | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| First Trust | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | Against | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | Against | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against | For | No report | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Rubis SCA meeting?
75 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 11 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 0 of 23 voted against management (0.0%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Rubis SCA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Rubis SCA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Rubis SCA with a meeting date within three days of 11 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.