Vote Scores

Home / Companies / RUMO SA / 30 Apr 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 202481 filers reporting

RUMO SA: meeting of 30 Apr 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

81 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the RUMO SA meeting of 30 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

6 nominees; 41.7% of reported votes for; 7 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

48 vote records from 8 filers. 7 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

12.5% for0.0% against87.5% other87.5% against management8 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

4 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management3,183,122 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

50 vote records from 6 filers. 5 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

16.7% for0.0% against83.3% other83.3% against management6 filers83.1% for0.0% against16.9% other16.9% against management13,900,165 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

7 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management5 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management588,325 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

127 vote records from 80 filers. 0 of the 80 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management80 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management271,673,771 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

806 vote records from 80 filers. 59 of the 80 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

26.3% for0.0% against73.8% other73.8% against management80 filers74.9% for0.0% against25.1% other25.1% against management1,866,792,705 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

373 vote records from 80 filers. 2 of the 80 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

97.5% for2.5% against2.5% against management80 filers94.1% for0.9% against5.0% other7.6% against management812,362,789 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

28 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management5 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management588,325 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
9

AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED

113 vote records from 67 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 67 filers reported this item without a management mark.

89.6% for7.5% against3.0% other67 filers44.4% for45.0% against10.6% other264,792,212 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors3. Auditor9. Proposal
VanguardNo reportNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesNo reportNo reportFor
FidelityNo reportNo reportAbstain or withhold
DimensionalNo reportNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRNo reportNo reportFor
American CenturyNo reportNo reportFor
Franklin TempletonNo reportNo reportFor
InvescoNo reportNo reportFor
EquitableNo reportNo reportFor
Charles SchwabAbstain or withhold *No reportNo report
Nuveen and TIAANo reportNo reportFor
ProShares and ProFundsNo reportNo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeNo reportAbstain or withhold *No report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportNo reportFor
J.P. MorganNo reportAbstain or withhold *No report
Goldman SachsNo reportNo reportFor
WisdomTreeNo reportNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsNo reportAbstain or withhold *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportNo reportFor
Lincoln FinancialNo reportNo reportFor
VoyaNo reportNo reportFor
First TrustNo reportNo reportFor
Russell InvestmentsAbstain or withhold *No reportNo report
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportNo reportAgainst
Pacific Life fundsNo reportNo reportFor
Global XAbstain or withhold *No reportNo report
MFSNo reportNo reportFor
Federated HermesAbstain or withhold *No reportNo report
DWSNo reportNo reportFor
VanEckAbstain or withhold *No reportNo report
Artisan PartnersNo reportNo reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the RUMO SA meeting?

81 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 0 of 1 voted against management (0.0%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by RUMO SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for RUMO SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing RUMO SA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.