Home / Companies / RUMO SA / 28 Apr 2026
RUMO SA: meeting of 28 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
72 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the RUMO SA meeting of 28 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
6 nominees; 33.3% of reported votes for; 7 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
60 vote records from 7 filers. 7 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
72 vote records from 9 filers. 9 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
12 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
121 vote records from 71 filers. 0 of the 71 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
521 vote records from 71 filers. 42 of the 71 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,055 vote records from 71 filers. 2 of the 71 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
56 vote records from 9 filers. 1 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED
80 vote records from 48 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 48 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Abstain or withhold * | No report | For |
| Fidelity | No report | No report | For |
| Dimensional | No report | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | No report | For |
| American Century | No report | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | No report | For |
| Equitable | No report | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | Abstain or withhold * | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | No report | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | No report | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| Jackson National funds | No report | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | No report | For |
| Voya | No report | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | Abstain or withhold * | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | Abstain or withhold * | No report | No report |
| Principal | No report | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | No report | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | No report | No report | For |
| VanEck | Abstain or withhold * | No report | No report |
| Cohen & Steers | No report | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the RUMO SA meeting?
72 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 1 voted against management (0.0%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by RUMO SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for RUMO SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing RUMO SA with a meeting date within three days of 28 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.