Saras SpA
How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2024
- Filers reporting
- 44year to 30 June 2024
- Against management on pay
- 70.0%7 of 10 reporting filers
- Same, by reported shares
- 57.8%shares reported on Form N-PX
- Meetings on file
- 1across 1 season
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
44 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Saras SpA for the year to 30 June 2024, across one meeting.
On the advisory vote on executive pay, 7 of the 10 filers that reported a position voted against management (70.0%), 62.5 percentage points above the median company on this site (7.5%). By reported shares the figure is 57.8% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.
Among the largest fund families, 1 voted with management on pay and 2 voted against: J.P. Morgan and John Hancock and Manulife.
Meetings
| Meeting date | Season | Filers reporting | Items | Against management on pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Apr 2024 | year to 30 June 2024 | 44 | 11 | 70.0% |
Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.
Say-on-pay: this company and the median
| year to 30 June 2024 | Saras SpA | Median company |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting filers voting against management | 70.0% | 7.5% |
| Reported shares voted against management | 57.8% | 2.9% |
Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,781 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.
How the largest families voted
Meeting of 29 Apr 2024: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.
| Family | Say-on-pay | Proposal A | Proposal B | Proposal C | Proposal D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Fidelity | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Dimensional | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| American Century | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Invesco | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report |
| WisdomTree | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Voya | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Victory Capital | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Transamerica | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| PIMCO | No report | For | For | Against | For |
| Virtus | No report | For | For | Against | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
- Proposal A: Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED
- Proposal B: Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
- Proposal C: Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED
- Proposal D: Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED
By season
| Season | Filers reporting | Against management on pay, filers | By reported shares | Say-on-pay split |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| year to 30 June 2024 | 44 | 70.0% | 57.8% |
Category mix
Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.
| Category | Vote records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIT-RELATED | 153 | 29.8% |
| COMPENSATION | 118 | 23.0% |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 112 | 21.8% |
| CAPITAL STRUCTURE | 59 | 11.5% |
| OTHER | 48 | 9.4% |
| DIRECTOR ELECTIONS | 12 | 2.3% |
| SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES | 11 | 2.1% |
Questions
How did large funds vote at Saras SpA?
For the year to 30 June 2024, 10 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Saras SpA; 7 voted against management (70.0%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.
Were there shareholder proposals at Saras SpA?
Filers reported 4 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2024. Across them, 100.0% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.
Is this the meeting result?
No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Saras SpA reports on Form 8-K.
Where does the data come from?
From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 30 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,781 companies.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Saras SpA, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026; page built 1 Oct 2026.