Home / Companies / Severn Trent Plc / 6 Jul 2023
Severn Trent Plc: meeting of 6 Jul 2023
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
147 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Severn Trent Plc meeting of 6 Jul 2023. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 99.8% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,196 vote records from 129 filers. 0 of the 129 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
50 vote records from 29 filers. 2 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
488 vote records from 129 filers. 0 of the 129 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
9 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,179 vote records from 128 filers. 4 of the 128 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
231 vote records from 118 filers. 0 of the 117 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
452 vote records from 128 filers. 0 of the 128 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCEIssuer
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
27 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
233 vote records from 118 filers. 0 of the 118 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
52 vote records from 22 filers. 0 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| DWS | For | No report | For |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | For |
| VanEck | For | No report | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Severn Trent Plc meeting?
147 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Jul 2023. On say-on-pay, 2 of 27 voted against management (7.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Severn Trent Plc on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Severn Trent Plc
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Severn Trent Plc with a meeting date within three days of 6 Jul 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.