Home / Companies / SIEMENS AG / 13 Feb 2025
SIEMENS AG: meeting of 13 Feb 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
355 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the SIEMENS AG meeting of 13 Feb 2025. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
5 nominees; 80.6% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
784 vote records from 75 filers. 2 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
334 vote records from 288 filers. 4 of the 264 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
229 vote records from 77 filers. 1 of the 76 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
437 vote records from 76 filers. 0 of the 75 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
216 vote records from 72 filers. 2 of the 71 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
3,006 vote records from 76 filers. 1 of the 75 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
53 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Counter Motion
49 vote records from 13 filers. 1 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
73 vote records from 11 filers. 1 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | No report |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | No report | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | Against |
| First Trust | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | Against |
| Global X | For | No report | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| VanEck | For | No report | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the SIEMENS AG meeting?
355 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 Feb 2025. On say-on-pay, 4 of 264 voted against management (1.5%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by SIEMENS AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for SIEMENS AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing SIEMENS AG with a meeting date within three days of 13 Feb 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.