Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Tesla, Inc. / 6 Nov 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20261,994 filers reporting

Tesla, Inc.: meeting of 6 Nov 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,994 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Tesla, Inc. meeting of 6 Nov 2025. Their records fall into 16 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 59.3% of reported votes for; 348 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

4,248 vote records from 481 filers. 157 of the 476 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

65.3% for33.3% against1.5% other33.0% against management481 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

3,481 vote records from 1,980 filers. 831 of the 1,883 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 97 filers reported this item without a management mark.

50.1% for43.6% against6.3% other44.1% against management1,980 filers70.8% for29.1% against0.1% other28.9% against management1,681,465,397 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,415 vote records from 477 filers. 10 of the 473 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.1% for1.5% against1.5% other2.1% against management477 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.1% against management593,911,799 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

338 vote records from 120 filers. 13 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 99 filers reported this item without a management mark.

87.5% for5.0% against7.5% other61.9% against management120 filers54.9% for44.9% against0.2% other75.8% against management82,292,691 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

212 vote records from 92 filers. 34 of the 88 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

58.7% for40.2% against1.1% other38.6% against management92 filers77.6% for22.4% against22.2% against management20,983,108 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

2,680 vote records from 487 filers. 154 of the 482 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

53.8% for32.6% against13.6% other32.0% against management487 filers83.7% for16.1% against0.1% other16.1% against management1,169,026,906 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,232 vote records from 400 filers. 10 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 373 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.0% for5.3% against2.8% other37.0% against management400 filers90.8% for9.2% against0.0% other85.4% against management517,042,625 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

A shareholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of...

1,369 vote records from 462 filers. 42 of the 457 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

6.7% for90.7% against2.6% other9.2% against management462 filers0.6% for99.1% against0.2% other1.0% against management593,342,493 reported shares
9

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

A shareholder proposal to amend the bylaws to repeal 3% derivative suit ownership threshold.

1,309 vote records from 451 filers. 146 of the 446 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

29.0% for67.6% against3.3% other32.7% against management451 filers35.3% for63.7% against1.0% other36.4% against management572,733,182 reported shares
10

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

A shareholder proposal to amend Article X of the bylaws.

1,362 vote records from 459 filers. 108 of the 454 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

20.0% for76.9% against3.1% other23.8% against management459 filers12.2% for86.9% against1.0% other13.3% against management593,002,571 reported shares
11

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

A shareholder proposal to seek shareholder approval before adopting an amendment to the bylaws pursuant to...

1,360 vote records from 458 filers. 348 of the 453 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

75.8% for22.9% against1.3% other76.8% against management458 filers80.6% for19.3% against0.0% other80.7% against management592,980,600 reported shares
12

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder

Declassify the Board of Directors

1,365 vote records from 461 filers. 395 of the 456 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.5% for13.0% against1.5% other86.6% against management461 filers95.5% for4.5% against0.0% other95.6% against management593,014,873 reported shares
13

HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder

A shareholder proposal requesting a child labor audit.

1,363 vote records from 458 filers. 34 of the 453 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

4.8% for92.6% against2.6% other7.5% against management458 filers0.6% for99.2% against0.2% other1.0% against management593,003,301 reported shares
14

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (A)

1,308 vote records from 451 filers. 333 of the 445 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

73.6% for25.1% against1.3% other74.8% against management451 filers36.5% for63.5% against0.0% other36.5% against management572,684,912 reported shares
15

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (B)

1,307 vote records from 451 filers. 9 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 440 filers reported this item without a management mark.

8.2% for76.7% against15.1% other81.8% against management451 filers11.5% for41.2% against47.3% other40.0% against management572,682,154 reported shares
16

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

354 vote records from 28 filers. 10 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

21.4% for78.6% against35.7% against management28 filers34.2% for65.8% against0.0% other48.3% against management62,889,560 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor8. Proposal9. Proposal10. Proposal11. Proposal12. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
BlackRock and iSharesAgainst *ForForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
FidelityAgainst *ForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstFor *
DimensionalAgainst *Against *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
State Street and SPDRAgainst *ForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
American CenturyForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
InvescoForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
EquitableAgainst *ForForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *For *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *For *
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *Against *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *For *
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeAgainst *ForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Jackson National fundsAgainst *ForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
SEIAgainst *Against *ForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
ThriventForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
VoyaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
First TrustForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *Against *ForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
NationwideAgainst *ForForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
Victory CapitalForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
BNY MellonAgainst *ForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
PrincipalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainst *ForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *For *
Pacific Life fundsAgainst *ForForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
Global XAgainst *Against *ForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
MFSForAgainst *ForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *For *
TransamericaForForForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
Federated HermesAgainst *Against *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *Against *ForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *For *
Hartford FundsAgainst *ForForAgainstAbstain or withhold *Abstain or withhold *For *For *
DWSForAgainst *ForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
PIMCOForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
AllspringForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
MassMutualForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Harbor FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusAgainst *Against *ForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
VanEckAgainst *Against *ForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportAgainst *No reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Neuberger BermanAgainst *Against *ForAgainstFor *For *For *For *
American BeaconForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportAgainst *No reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Tesla, Inc. meeting?

1,994 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Nov 2025. On say-on-pay, 831 of 1,883 voted against management (44.1%). 8 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Tesla, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Tesla, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Tesla, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 6 Nov 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.