Home / Companies / Tesla, Inc. / 6 Nov 2025
Tesla, Inc.: meeting of 6 Nov 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,994 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Tesla, Inc. meeting of 6 Nov 2025. Their records fall into 16 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 59.3% of reported votes for; 348 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,248 vote records from 481 filers. 157 of the 476 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,481 vote records from 1,980 filers. 831 of the 1,883 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 97 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,415 vote records from 477 filers. 10 of the 473 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
338 vote records from 120 filers. 13 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 99 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
212 vote records from 92 filers. 34 of the 88 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,680 vote records from 487 filers. 154 of the 482 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,232 vote records from 400 filers. 10 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 373 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
A shareholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of...
1,369 vote records from 462 filers. 42 of the 457 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
A shareholder proposal to amend the bylaws to repeal 3% derivative suit ownership threshold.
1,309 vote records from 451 filers. 146 of the 446 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
A shareholder proposal to amend Article X of the bylaws.
1,362 vote records from 459 filers. 108 of the 454 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
A shareholder proposal to seek shareholder approval before adopting an amendment to the bylaws pursuant to...
1,360 vote records from 458 filers. 348 of the 453 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder
Declassify the Board of Directors
1,365 vote records from 461 filers. 395 of the 456 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
A shareholder proposal requesting a child labor audit.
1,363 vote records from 458 filers. 34 of the 453 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (A)
1,308 vote records from 451 filers. 333 of the 445 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (B)
1,307 vote records from 451 filers. 9 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 440 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
354 vote records from 28 filers. 10 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal | 12. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Fidelity | Against * | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Dimensional | Against * | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Equitable | Against * | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | Against * | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| SEI | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Russell Investments | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Nationwide | Against * | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | Against * | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Global X | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| MFS | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| Hartford Funds | Against * | For | For | Against | Abstain or withhold * | Abstain or withhold * | For * | For * |
| DWS | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | Against * | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| VanEck | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Tesla, Inc. meeting?
1,994 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Nov 2025. On say-on-pay, 831 of 1,883 voted against management (44.1%). 8 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Tesla, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Tesla, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Tesla, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 6 Nov 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.