Home / Companies / TIM SA / 31 Mar 2026
TIM SA: meeting of 31 Mar 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
101 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the TIM SA meeting of 31 Mar 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 49.5% of reported votes for; 77 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
314 vote records from 100 filers. 12 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
9 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
20 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
40 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
64 vote records from 34 filers. 0 of the 33 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
316 vote records from 100 filers. 0 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
271 vote records from 100 filers. 6 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
634 vote records from 100 filers. 0 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
115 vote records from 14 filers. 1 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | Split or no vote | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Split or no vote | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report |
| Equitable | Split or no vote | No report |
| Charles Schwab | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Split or no vote | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Against | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | No report |
| SEI | Against | No report |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | Split or no vote | No report |
| Voya | Split or no vote | No report |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | No report |
| Russell Investments | Against | No report |
| Nationwide | Against | No report |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report |
| Global X | Against | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Split or no vote | No report |
| Hartford Funds | Against | No report |
| PIMCO | Split or no vote | No report |
| Harbor Funds | Against * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the TIM SA meeting?
101 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 31 Mar 2026. On say-on-pay, 1 of 1 voted against management (100.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by TIM SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for TIM SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing TIM SA with a meeting date within three days of 31 Mar 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.