Home / Companies / UBS GROUP AG / 10 Apr 2025
UBS GROUP AG: meeting of 10 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
492 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the UBS GROUP AG meeting of 10 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
15 nominees; 88.6% of reported votes for; 120 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
6,479 vote records from 214 filers. 0 of the 186 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
477 vote records from 176 filers. 26 of the 165 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
459 vote records from 210 filers. 2 of the 182 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,317 vote records from 213 filers. 0 of the 185 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,708 vote records from 215 filers. 1 of the 187 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,551 vote records from 213 filers. 0 of the 185 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
81 vote records from 40 filers. 2 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
247 vote records from 41 filers. 0 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESSecurity holder
Compensation
210 vote records from 166 filers. 32 of the 156 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | No report |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | For | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | No report |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | No report |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | No report |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | No report |
| Voya | For | No report | For | No report |
| First Trust | For | For | For | No report |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | No report |
| Principal | For | No report | For | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| Global X | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| MFS | For | No report | For | No report |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | No report |
| Hartford Funds | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote * | No report |
| PIMCO | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Allspring | For | No report | For | No report |
| MassMutual | For | No report | For | Against * |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Dodge & Cox | For | No report | For | No report |
| Baird | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Artisan Partners | For | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the UBS GROUP AG meeting?
492 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 26 of 165 voted against management (15.8%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by UBS GROUP AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for UBS GROUP AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing UBS GROUP AG with a meeting date within three days of 10 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.