Home / Companies / UBS GROUP AG / 24 Apr 2024
UBS GROUP AG: meeting of 24 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
472 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the UBS GROUP AG meeting of 24 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
15 nominees; 93.2% of reported votes for; 27 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
7,201 vote records from 238 filers. 0 of the 212 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 26 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
443 vote records from 259 filers. 6 of the 243 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
563 vote records from 237 filers. 4 of the 211 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 26 filers reported this item without a management mark.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
441 vote records from 209 filers. 1 of the 198 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
988 vote records from 233 filers. 0 of the 209 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,473 vote records from 245 filers. 1 of the 219 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 26 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,679 vote records from 237 filers. 0 of the 211 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 26 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
62 vote records from 34 filers. 2 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
349 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
3 vote records from 1 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | Against * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| MFS | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| American Beacon | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | No report | For |
| Dodge & Cox | For | No report | For |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the UBS GROUP AG meeting?
472 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 6 of 243 voted against management (2.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by UBS GROUP AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for UBS GROUP AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing UBS GROUP AG with a meeting date within three days of 24 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.