Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Vetoquinol SA

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

Vetoquinol SA

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
16year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
66.7%2 of 3 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
not reportedshares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
40.0% for20.0% against40.0% other66.7% against management5 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

16 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Vetoquinol SA for the year to 30 June 2026, across one meeting.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 2 of the 3 filers that reported a position voted against management (66.7%), 60.1 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Among the largest fund families, 1 voted with management on pay and 1 voted against: John Hancock and Manulife.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
20 May 2026year to 30 June 202616666.7%
22 May 2025year to 30 June 202520883.3%
28 May 2024year to 30 June 2024248100.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Vetoquinol SAMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management66.7%6.6%
Reported shares voted against managementwithheld2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 20 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-pay
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *
Harbor FundsFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 202424100.0%74.9%
year to 30 June 20252083.3%80.0%
year to 30 June 20261666.7%withheld

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
COMPENSATION50728.7%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE48727.5%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE36920.9%
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS18710.6%
OTHER935.3%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES744.2%
AUDIT-RELATED321.8%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES201.1%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Vetoquinol SA?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 3 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Vetoquinol SA; 2 voted against management (66.7%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Vetoquinol SA?

No proposal from security holders was reported by enough filers to be shown for the year to 30 June 2026.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Vetoquinol SA reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 30 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Vetoquinol SA, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026; page built 1 Oct 2026.