Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Wells Fargo & Company

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

Wells Fargo & Company

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
1,894year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
42.9%776 of 1,808 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
18.5%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
53.1% for43.2% against3.8% other42.9% against management1,865 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

1,894 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Wells Fargo & Company for the year to 30 June 2026, across 2 meetings.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 776 of the 1,808 filers that reported a position voted against management (42.9%), 36.3 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 18.5% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
28 Apr 2026year to 30 June 20261,8781142.9%
29 Apr 2025year to 30 June 20251,83187.0%
30 Apr 2024year to 30 June 20241,712155.7%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Wells Fargo & CompanyMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management42.9%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management18.5%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 28 Apr 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal BProposal CProposal DProposal EProposal F
VanguardForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
DimensionalAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
State Street and SPDRAgainst *No reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
American CenturyForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Franklin TempletonAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
InvescoForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
EquitableForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Charles SchwabForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *AgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
SEIAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
First TrustAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
NationwideForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Victory CapitalAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *For *Against *Against *Against *Against *
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
BNY MellonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Pacific Life fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
MFSForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
TransamericaForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Federated HermesForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstFor *
Hartford FundsForAgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainst
DWSAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
PIMCOAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
AllspringAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
MassMutualAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Harbor FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusAgainst *For *For *For *AgainstAgainstFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsAgainst *For *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Janus HendersonAgainst *No reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
American BeaconForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Lord AbbettForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Dodge & CoxForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Harris Associates and OakmarkForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BairdAgainst *No reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Artisan PartnersForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241,7165.7%0.7%
year to 30 June 20251,8487.0%3.5%
year to 30 June 20261,89442.9%18.5%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS47,32354.7%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES9,66811.2%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES7,0608.2%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE6,0317.0%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE5,0195.8%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE4,6435.4%
AUDIT-RELATED3,7454.3%
COMPENSATION1,4451.7%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION1,1951.4%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES4200.5%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Wells Fargo & Company?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,808 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Wells Fargo & Company; 776 voted against management (42.9%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Wells Fargo & Company?

Filers reported 6 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 3.8% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Wells Fargo & Company reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Wells Fargo & Company, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.