Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Adobe Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXADBE · SEC company no. 796343

Adobe Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
1,835year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
44.7%779 of 1,742 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
41.8%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
4across 3 seasons
51.4% for44.2% against4.4% other44.7% against management1,803 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,835 funds and managers listed Adobe Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (2 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 779 of the 1,742 filers that reported a position voted against management (44.7%), 38.1 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 41.8% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
15 Apr 2026year to 30 June 20261,8201044.7%
22 Apr 2025year to 30 June 20251,977715.7%
17 Apr 2024year to 30 June 20242,020710.8%
20 Feb 2024year to 30 June 2024320.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Adobe Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management44.7%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management41.8%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 15 Apr 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal BProposal CProposal D
VanguardForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *AgainstAgainstFor *Against
J.P. MorganAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
SEIForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaAgainst *For *AgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
NationwideAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsAgainstAgainst *Against *Against *Against *
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
MFSForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
TransamericaAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
DWSAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PIMCOAgainst *For *For *For *Against
AllspringAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
MassMutualForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harbor FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VanEckForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsAgainst *No reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonAgainst *No reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
American BeaconForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lord AbbettForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Dodge & CoxForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdAgainst *No reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20242,02910.8%withheld
year to 30 June 20252,00415.7%17.0%
year to 30 June 20261,83544.7%41.8%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS45,28761.4%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES11,12315.1%
COMPENSATION6,9299.4%
AUDIT-RELATED3,9925.4%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE1,5862.2%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE1,3801.9%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE1,1491.6%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION1,1341.5%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES1,1161.5%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES20.0%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Adobe Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,742 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Adobe Inc.; 779 voted against management (44.7%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Adobe Inc.?

Filers reported 4 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 5.5% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Adobe Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Adobe Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.