Home / Companies / Alphabet Inc. / 7 Jun 2024
Alphabet Inc.: meeting of 7 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
753 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Alphabet Inc. meeting of 7 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 16 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 72.9% of reported votes for; 424 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
18,792 vote records from 627 filers. 30 of the 622 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
247 vote records from 100 filers. 33 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,877 vote records from 622 filers. 17 of the 617 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Company-specific--compensation-related
1,829 vote records from 613 filers. 22 of the 610 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding a human rights assessment of Al-driven targeted ad policies
1,811 vote records from 604 filers. 363 of the 602 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
7 proposal regarding report on climate risks
1,808 vote records from 603 filers. 108 of the 600 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding a report on online safety for children
1,786 vote records from 602 filers. 299 of the 599 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding an EEO policy risk report
1,782 vote records from 601 filers. 30 of the 598 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding a report on reproductive healthcare misinformation risks
1,698 vote records from 581 filers. 145 of the 579 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding a report on electromagnetic radiation and wireless technologies risks
1,701 vote records from 582 filers. 24 of the 580 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding a lobbying report
1,777 vote records from 600 filers. 343 of the 598 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
S/H Proposal - Political/Government
1,788 vote records from 601 filers. 27 of the 599 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding a report on generative Al misinformation and disinformation risks
1,782 vote records from 601 filers. 386 of the 598 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding equal shareholder voting
1,692 vote records from 580 filers. 512 of the 576 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding Al principles and Board oversight
1,695 vote records from 580 filers. 167 of the 577 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
762 vote records from 49 filers. 16 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Against | Against | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against |
| SEI | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | Split or no vote | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against | Abstain or withhold * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Virtus | Against * | Against * | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| VanEck | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Baird | Split or no vote | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Alphabet Inc. meeting?
753 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 33 of 93 voted against management (35.5%). 12 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Alphabet Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Alphabet Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Alphabet Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 7 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.