Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Equatorial SA

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

Equatorial SA

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
84year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
100.0%1 of 1 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
100.0%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
8across 3 seasons

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 84 funds and managers listed Equatorial SA in their Form N-PX filings (2 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 1 of the 1 filers that reported a position voted against management (100.0%), 93.4 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 100.0% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
30 Apr 2026year to 30 June 2026719100.0%
31 Oct 2025year to 30 June 2026763not reported
30 Apr 2025year to 30 June 2025728100.0%
20 Dec 2024year to 30 June 2025713not reported
25 Oct 2024year to 30 June 2025724not reported
26 Aug 2024year to 30 June 2025704not reported
23 May 2024year to 30 June 2024763not reported
30 Apr 2024year to 30 June 20247880.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Equatorial SAMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management100.0%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management100.0%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 31 Oct 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

None of the families tracked on this site reported a position on these items.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 2024790.0%0.0%
year to 30 June 202581100.0%100.0%
year to 30 June 202684100.0%100.0%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE4,19642.9%
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS2,02020.7%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE1,18812.2%
COMPENSATION1,01710.4%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS5785.9%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES3443.5%
OTHER3143.2%
AUDIT-RELATED900.9%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES240.2%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Equatorial SA?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Equatorial SA; 1 voted against management (100.0%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Equatorial SA?

No proposal from security holders was reported by enough filers to be shown for the year to 30 June 2026.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Equatorial SA reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Equatorial SA, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.