Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Ion Beam Applications SA

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

Ion Beam Applications SA

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
11year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
50.0%1 of 2 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
52.8%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
6across 3 seasons
0.0% for25.0% against75.0% other50.0% against management4 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

11 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Ion Beam Applications SA for the year to 30 June 2026, across 2 meetings.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 1 of the 2 filers that reported a position voted against management (50.0%), 43.4 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 52.8% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Among the largest fund families, 1 voted with management on pay and 1 voted against: John Hancock and Manulife.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
29 Jun 2026year to 30 June 202693not reported
10 Jun 2026year to 30 June 202611650.0%
11 Jun 2025year to 30 June 2025970.0%
7 Jan 2025year to 30 June 2025133not reported
12 Jun 2024year to 30 June 20241270.0%
4 Sep 2023year to 30 June 2024164not reported

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Ion Beam Applications SAMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management50.0%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management52.8%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 10 Jun 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-pay
BlackRock and iSharesSplit or no vote
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 2024180.0%0.0%
year to 30 June 2025130.0%0.0%
year to 30 June 20261150.0%52.8%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE26027.8%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE24426.1%
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS11512.3%
OTHER9310.0%
AUDIT-RELATED808.6%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES687.3%
COMPENSATION586.2%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES121.3%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS40.4%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Ion Beam Applications SA?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Ion Beam Applications SA; 1 voted against management (50.0%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Ion Beam Applications SA?

No proposal from security holders was reported by enough filers to be shown for the year to 30 June 2026.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Ion Beam Applications SA reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 30 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Ion Beam Applications SA, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026; page built 1 Oct 2026.