Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXKMB · SEC company no. 55785

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
1,492year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
8.2%113 of 1,381 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
2.5%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
8across 3 seasons
87.8% for8.0% against4.2% other8.2% against management1,432 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,492 funds and managers listed Kimberly-Clark Corporation in their Form N-PX filings (5 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 113 of the 1,381 filers that reported a position voted against management (8.2%), 1.6 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 2.5% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
14 May 2026year to 30 June 20261,44468.2%
24 Mar 2026year to 30 June 20263150.0%
16 Mar 2026year to 30 June 2026310.0%
29 Jan 2026year to 30 June 202631740.0%
1 May 2025year to 30 June 20251,49656.1%
5 Jan 2025year to 30 June 2025310.0%
2 May 2024year to 30 June 20241,418710.1%
5 Feb 2024year to 30 June 2024410.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Kimberly-Clark CorporationMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management8.2%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management2.5%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 14 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst
FidelityForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainst
American CenturyForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForFor *
InvescoForFor *
EquitableForAgainst
Charles SchwabForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForFor *
Jackson National fundsForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst
SEIForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst
ThriventForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst *
VoyaForAgainst
First TrustForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForFor *
NationwideForFor *
Victory CapitalForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *
Guggenheim and RydexForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor *
BNY MellonForAgainst
PrincipalForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsForFor *
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst
Global XForFor *
MFSForAgainst
TransamericaForAgainst
Federated HermesForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForAgainst
Hartford FundsForAgainst
DWSForFor *
PIMCOForFor *
AllspringSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
MassMutualForAgainst
Harbor FundsForFor *
VirtusForFor *
VanEckForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForNo report
Janus HendersonForNo report
Neuberger BermanForNo report
American BeaconForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForFor *
Cohen & SteersForNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo report
BairdForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241,42410.1%withheld
year to 30 June 20251,5146.1%4.9%
year to 30 June 20261,4928.2%2.5%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS32,37971.4%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES6,92215.3%
AUDIT-RELATED2,5605.6%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE2,4755.5%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS8441.9%
COMPENSATION1550.3%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE270.1%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Kimberly-Clark Corporation?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,381 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Kimberly-Clark Corporation; 113 voted against management (8.2%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Kimberly-Clark Corporation?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 48.3% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Kimberly-Clark Corporation reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Kimberly-Clark Corporation, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.