Vote Scores

Home / Companies / OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2025

Filers reporting
107year to 30 June 2025
Against management on pay
1.1%1 of 91 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
0.8%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
2across 2 seasons
94.7% for1.1% against4.2% other1.1% against management95 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

107 Form N-PX filers reported votes at OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD for the year to 30 June 2025, across 2 meetings.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 1 of the 91 filers that reported a position voted against management (1.1%), 7.0 percentage points below the median company on this site (8.1%). By reported shares the figure is 0.8% (median 4.0%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
8 May 2025year to 30 June 202510271.1%
9 May 2024year to 30 June 202412463.4%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2025OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTDMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management1.1%8.1%
Reported shares voted against management0.8%4.0%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,794 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 8 May 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-pay
BlackRock and iSharesFor
Charles SchwabFor
John Hancock and ManulifeFor
Jackson National fundsFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesFor
First TrustFor
Russell InvestmentsFor
Global XFor
VanEckFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesFor
BairdFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241273.4%2.9%
year to 30 June 20251071.1%0.8%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS1,31059.6%
COMPENSATION36716.7%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES23510.7%
AUDIT-RELATED1516.9%
OTHER693.1%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE492.2%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE120.5%
INVESTMENT COMPANY MATTERS50.2%

Questions

How did large funds vote at OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD?

For the year to 30 June 2025, 91 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD; 1 voted against management (1.1%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD?

No proposal from security holders was reported by enough filers to be shown for the year to 30 June 2025.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 30 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,794 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026; page built 1 Oct 2026.