Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Prestige Estates Projects Limited / 10 Sep 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202648 filers reporting

Prestige Estates Projects Limited: meeting of 10 Sep 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

48 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Prestige Estates Projects Limited meeting of 10 Sep 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 93.8% of reported votes for; 5 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

80 vote records from 47 filers. 5 of the 47 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

89.4% for10.6% against10.6% against management47 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

15 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for100.0% against100.0% against management1 filers0.0% for100.0% against100.0% against management6,275,754 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

103 vote records from 47 filers. 1 of the 47 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

97.9% for0.0% against2.1% other2.1% against management47 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management18,852,903 reported shares
4

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

40 vote records from 11 filers. 0 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management11 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management8,540,256 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

160 vote records from 47 filers. 0 of the 47 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management47 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management28,487,484 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

297 vote records from 47 filers. 38 of the 47 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

19.1% for80.9% against80.9% against management47 filers27.7% for72.3% against72.3% against management52,365,807 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

264 vote records from 39 filers. 0 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management39 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management47,765,974 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

16 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management8 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management668,738 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors3. Auditor
VanguardForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForFor
FidelityForFor
DimensionalForFor
State Street and SPDRForFor
American CenturyForFor
Franklin TempletonForFor
InvescoAgainst *For
EquitableForAbstain or withhold *
Charles SchwabAgainst *For
Nuveen and TIAAForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor
J.P. MorganAgainst *For
Goldman SachsForFor
WisdomTreeForFor
Jackson National fundsForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
Lincoln FinancialForFor
VoyaAgainst *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor
BNY MellonForFor
Pacific Life fundsForFor
Global XAgainst *For

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Prestige Estates Projects Limited meeting?

48 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Sep 2025. On say-on-pay, 1 of 1 voted against management (100.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Prestige Estates Projects Limited on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Prestige Estates Projects Limited

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Prestige Estates Projects Limited with a meeting date within three days of 10 Sep 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.