Vote Scores

Home / Filers / GDL FUND

Form N-PX · fund registrantSEC filer no. 1378701

GDL FUND

fund voting report

Vote records reported
702year to 30 June 2026
Against management
7.3%49 of 669 marked votes
Say-on-pay support
99.1%for, of for + against + abstain
Shareholder-proposal support
10.0%for, of for + against + abstain
91.2% for3.7% against5.0% other7.3% against management674 votes

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, GDL FUND reported 702 vote records on Form N-PX. 49 of the 669 votes that were marked for or against management went against management: 7.3%, 1.1 percentage points above the median fund registrant (6.2%).

Weighted by the number of shares voted, the against-management share is 3.6%. The two figures differ when the votes against management fall on larger or smaller holdings than the rest.

On pay and on shareholder proposals: it voted for 99.1% of the section 14A say-on-pay items it reported (the median fund registrant: 91.6%) and it voted for 10.0% of the proposals put forward by security holders (the median fund registrant: 27.5%).

By category, votes against management were most frequent in DIRECTOR ELECTIONS (10.1% of 277), OTHER (10.0% of 30) and CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (2.7% of 184).

Compared with other filers

Each rate is defined once, in the methodology. The median is taken over 1,241 fund registrants with at least 25 vote records in the season.

year to 30 June 2026This filerMedian fund registrantAll filers pooled
Against-management share7.3%6.2%10.6%
Say-on-pay support rate99.1%91.6%86.0%
Shareholder-proposal support rate10.0%27.5%33.9%
Shares on loan, share of shares held0.00%0.00%3.12%
Largest families, year to 30 June 2026Against managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal support
Vanguard20.1%94.1%42.0%
BlackRock and iShares7.5%88.3%11.9%
Fidelity6.0%94.7%27.6%
Dimensional16.4%78.9%57.4%
State Street and SPDR16.9%77.1%50.4%

Votes by category

Filers choose one or more categories for each vote, so a vote can appear in more than one row. Category names are printed as Form N-PX defines them.

Category (as the form names it)VotesForAgainstAgainst managementSplit
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS277249810.1%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES11010610.9%
AUDIT-RELATED343400.0%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES2110.0%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS9900.0%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE85350.0%
COMPENSATION158646.2%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE18717662.7%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE200100.0%
OTHER3027010.0%

By season

SeasonVote recordsAgainst managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal supportSplit
year to 30 June 20241,5057.8%not reported0.0%
year to 30 June 20257456.4%93.1%0.0%
year to 30 June 20267027.3%99.1%10.0%

Say-on-pay votes against management

Counting one say-on-pay item per company meeting, GDL FUND voted against management on 1 of the 74 it marked either way (1.4%) in the year to 30 June 2026.

Shareholder proposals it supported

Of 9 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the filings and on which it cast a vote, GDL FUND voted for 1 (11.1%). Titles are the most common wording among filers; where a wording could name a person, the SEC category is printed instead.

CompanyMeetingProposal
Bel Fuse Inc.26 May 2026With respect to a shareholder proposal requesting that our board of directors take all necessary steps to...

Shares on loan

GDL FUND reported no shares on loan for the year to 30 June 2026. Shares lent out at the record date cannot be voted by the lender, which is why Form N-PX asks for the figure. More on lending and votes.

The filings

These figures are read from the filer's own Form N-PX. If a vote on this page looks wrong, the filing is the record: a dispute about a filed vote is a matter for the filer, and an error in how this site read the filing is a matter for corrections.

Questions

How did GDL FUND vote on executive pay?

In the year to 30 June 2026 GDL FUND reported 107 votes in the category SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES that were cast for, against or abstain. 106 were for (99.1%), 1 against and 0 abstentions. Counting one item per company meeting, it voted against management on 1 of the 74 say-on-pay items it marked either way.

How often does GDL FUND vote against management?

7.3% of the time in the year to 30 June 2026: 49 of the 669 votes it marked as for or against management. Form N-PX asks each filer to state, vote by vote, whether the vote was for or against management's recommendation; this figure counts those marks.

Did GDL FUND support shareholder proposals on climate?

In the category ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE it reported 2 votes on proposals from security holders in the year to 30 June 2026 and voted for 0 of them (0.0%). Across every category it voted for 10.0% of security-holder proposals. Filers choose the category for each vote, so the same proposal can sit in different categories in different filings.

Is this the result of the meetings?

No. Form N-PX shows how this filer voted the shares it held. It does not show how other shareholders voted or whether a proposal was approved. Companies report certified results separately, on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From the Form N-PX filings of this filer on the SEC's EDGAR system, read as filed. The SEC does not verify the contents. Amended filings (N-PX/A) replace the filings they amend. Data on this page runs through 23 Sep 2026.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings by GDL FUND (filer no. 1378701), read as filed and not verified by the SEC. Amended filings replace the filings they amend. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.