Vote Scores

Home / Filers / Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc

Form N-PX · fund registrantSEC filer no. 887215

Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc

fund voting report

Vote records reported
166year to 30 June 2026
Against management
3.7%6 of 164 marked votes
Say-on-pay support
100.0%for, of for + against + abstain
Shareholder-proposal support
8.3%for, of for + against + abstain
89.2% for9.6% against1.2% other3.7% against management166 votes

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc reported 166 vote records for the year to 30 June 2026. It marked 3.7% of its votes as cast against management (6 of 164), 2.6 percentage points below the median fund registrant, which was 6.2%.

Weighted by the number of shares voted, the against-management share is 2.5%. The two figures differ when the votes against management fall on larger or smaller holdings than the rest.

On pay and on shareholder proposals: it voted for 100.0% of the section 14A say-on-pay items it reported (the median fund registrant: 91.6%) and it voted for 8.3% of the proposals put forward by security holders (the median fund registrant: 27.5%).

By category, votes against management were most frequent in DIRECTOR ELECTIONS (4.2% of 120).

Compared with other filers

Each rate is defined once, in the methodology. The median is taken over 1,241 fund registrants with at least 25 vote records in the season.

year to 30 June 2026This filerMedian fund registrantAll filers pooled
Against-management share3.7%6.2%10.6%
Say-on-pay support rate100.0%91.6%86.0%
Shareholder-proposal support rate8.3%27.5%33.9%
Shares on loan, share of shares held0.00%0.00%3.12%
Largest families, year to 30 June 2026Against managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal support
Vanguard20.1%94.1%42.0%
BlackRock and iShares7.5%88.3%11.9%
Fidelity6.0%94.7%27.6%
Dimensional16.4%78.9%57.4%
State Street and SPDR16.9%77.1%50.4%

Votes by category

Filers choose one or more categories for each vote, so a vote can appear in more than one row. Category names are printed as Form N-PX defines them.

Category (as the form names it)VotesForAgainstAgainst managementSplit
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS12011554.2%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES121200.0%
AUDIT-RELATED121200.0%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES1100.0%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE1100.0%
COMPENSATION4400.0%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE43125.0%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE1010.0%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE3030.0%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES8080.0%
OTHER200not reported

By season

SeasonVote recordsAgainst managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal supportSplit
year to 30 June 20244590.0%100.0%0.0%
year to 30 June 20254320.0%100.0%0.0%
year to 30 June 20261663.7%100.0%8.3%

Say-on-pay votes against management

Counting one say-on-pay item per company meeting, Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc voted against management on 0 of the 12 it marked either way (0.0%) in the year to 30 June 2026.

Shareholder proposals it supported

Of 11 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the filings and on which it cast a vote, Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc voted for 1 (9.1%). Titles are the most common wording among filers; where a wording could name a person, the SEC category is printed instead.

CompanyMeetingProposal
Eli Lilly and Company4 May 2026Shareholder proposal to adopt a policy and amend the bylaws to require an independent board chair.

Shares on loan

Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc reported no shares on loan for the year to 30 June 2026. Shares lent out at the record date cannot be voted by the lender, which is why Form N-PX asks for the figure. More on lending and votes.

Fund series in this filing

1 series reported votes. A vote record can list several series. Series with 500 or more vote records have their own page.

SeriesVote recordsAgainst managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal support
Jensen Quality Growth Fund1663.7%100.0%8.3%

The filings

These figures are read from the filer's own Form N-PX. If a vote on this page looks wrong, the filing is the record: a dispute about a filed vote is a matter for the filer, and an error in how this site read the filing is a matter for corrections.

Questions

How did Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc vote on executive pay?

In the year to 30 June 2026 Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc reported 12 votes in the category SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES that were cast for, against or abstain. 12 were for (100.0%), 0 against and 0 abstentions. Counting one item per company meeting, it voted against management on 0 of the 12 say-on-pay items it marked either way.

How often does Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc vote against management?

3.7% of the time in the year to 30 June 2026: 6 of the 164 votes it marked as for or against management. Form N-PX asks each filer to state, vote by vote, whether the vote was for or against management's recommendation; this figure counts those marks.

Did Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc support shareholder proposals on climate?

In the category ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE it reported 1 votes on proposals from security holders in the year to 30 June 2026 and voted for 0 of them (0.0%). Across every category it voted for 8.3% of security-holder proposals. Filers choose the category for each vote, so the same proposal can sit in different categories in different filings.

Is this the result of the meetings?

No. Form N-PX shows how this filer voted the shares it held. It does not show how other shareholders voted or whether a proposal was approved. Companies report certified results separately, on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From the Form N-PX filings of this filer on the SEC's EDGAR system, read as filed. The SEC does not verify the contents. Amended filings (N-PX/A) replace the filings they amend. Data on this page runs through 23 Sep 2026.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings by Jensen Quality Growth Fund Inc (filer no. 887215), read as filed and not verified by the SEC. Amended filings replace the filings they amend. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.