Home / Companies / Intel Corporation / 13 May 2026
Intel Corporation: meeting of 13 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,788 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Intel Corporation meeting of 13 May 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 93.5% of reported votes for; 75 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
11,645 vote records from 375 filers. 4 of the 374 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,921 vote records from 1,775 filers. 341 of the 1,718 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 57 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,059 vote records from 371 filers. 18 of the 370 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
163 vote records from 53 filers. 1 of the 53 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,030 vote records from 387 filers. 11 of the 384 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Oversee Independent Review and Report on Human Rights Due Diligence Process
1,022 vote records from 359 filers. 33 of the 357 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a report on risk of China exposure.
1,007 vote records from 358 filers. 17 of the 356 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting an enduring policy separating the Chair and CEO roles.
1,002 vote records from 359 filers. 41 of the 357 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
60 vote records from 10 filers. 2 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against * | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | Against * | For * | Against | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Intel Corporation meeting?
1,788 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 341 of 1,718 voted against management (19.8%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Intel Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Intel Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Intel Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.